But then apparently after this provocative title should be a small starred asterisk where the author follows with the following caveat to his thesis: cyber war will not happen because for him cyber war is narrowly defined and does nDr. Some effects of cyberattacks may be more benign – or, at least, not as violent – as popular conceptions would suggest. We’d love your help. For instance, an enemy might render an air defense system harmless through a cyberattack instead of a bombing. Here's what the ratings mean: I feel my background as both a reviewer and someone who knows about the nuances of computer security allows for me to write a pretty informed yet unbiased review. The author says, "Cyber war will not take place," and you are reassured and hopeful that this means current cyber issues like Russia's infiltration of the elections and social media are not realistic to happen. by C. Hurst & Co. This book takes stock, twenty years on: is cyber war really coming?
Rid makes a specific point and he makes it well. Talk of cyber war is simply scare mongering. Whatever we select for our library has to excel in one or the other of these two core criteria: Therefore, I was very interested in this book when it came out and had to read it. If he'd gone with the majority of his field, he'd just have another book (of quite many) saying that cyber-war is a valid concern as others have named it such. Start by marking “Cyber War Will Not Take Place” as Want to Read: In 2005, the U.S. Air Force boasted it would now fly, fight, and win in cyberspace, the "fifth domain" of warfare. Interesting perspective on the cyber war topic. Makes a strong case for caution about the significance of cyber crimes and attacks, though his conflation of 'force' with 'violence' sidelines some of the larger implications. In one way, Rid succinctly lays out an argument I have been trying to make for years, yet he does it so much more clearly and well researched then I ever could have. Places cyber "war" in context of its intent -- to accomplish political ends. Places cyber "war" in context of its intent -- to accomplish political ends. Very informative and thorough analysis of the subject manner. Dr. They use the book to stress that the danger of cyber-threats is overhyped and that doom and gloom scenarios are unfounded. He draws on a range of thinkers, including Thomas Hobbes and Prussian military philosopher, Carl von Clausewitz, to illustrate his thesis that “cyberwar” distracts attention from how nations should debate and address cyberattacks. What this book does is to define some terms, tell some stories, and say mostly nothing. Your highlights will appear here. Cyber espionage means less reliance on putting human sources in danger. Sign in to share your opinion The author doesn't underestimate the cyber threat - it's just not so obvious as you would think - the cyber war is unlikely, though.provocative scholarly work but ultimately underwhelming. Has war indeed entered the fifth domain? Cyber operations are almost definitionally non-violent, and states increasingly using them is a net positive as compared to traditional methods of achieving the same aims. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Whether you believe that the various cyber-related attacks on the West by foreign powers, such as Russia, DPRK and China are acts of 'warfare', or not (and Rid says no, because there is no actual violence, which is a defining characteristic of 'war' in the traditional sense), they are clearly acts of aggression and are going on all the time - the most famous of which was,Despite the slightly click-baity title, this is an excellent and accessible book by one of the leading scholars in the field. Welcome back. Whether you believe that the various cyber-related attacks on the West by foreign powers, such as Russia, DPRK and China are acts of 'warfare', or not (and Rid says no, because there is no actual violence, which is a defining characteristic of 'war' in the traditional sense), they are clearly acts of aggression and are going on all the time - the most famous of which was, of course, the (US) Stuxnet attack on the Iranian nuclear programme. Thomas Rid argues that the focus on war and winning distracts from the real challenge of cyberspace: non-violent confrontation that may rival or even replace violence in surprising ways. In conclusion, evidence suggests that although it is unlikely to occur, the possibility that Cyber. There's also great discussion about cyber wepons. Cyber operations are almost definitionally non-violent, and states increasingly using them is a net positive as compared to traditional methods of achieving the same aims. If an aggressor launches a cyberattack that paralyzes a city and causes fatalities by...Thomas Rid’s book is rich in analysis and detail. The first group consists of those sympathetic to the claim that cyber-war will not take place.
Cyber War Will Not Take Place This definition even disregards attacks like Stuxnet from the US govt to Iran's. Cyber War Will Not Take Place cuts through the hype and takes a fresh look at cyber security. 1849042802 The result is a compelling and authoritative take on war and strategy in cyberspace, one that will surely be seminal in … Recommended. Rid's framework and methodology have many simiI write reviews of books for several publications and blogs--mainly literary ones--but also have been involved in software design and information security issues.